Member Center: Register | Log in

Search

web
      powered by

 

Home Page
Newsletters
Website Directory
Article Directory
Experts
Store
Inspirational Quotes
IQ & EQ Tests
Event Calendar
Discussion Board
Membership
Submit Your Articles
Submit Your Website
Advertising
About Us
Contact Us

Free Newsletter Sign Up


Great Ideas To Improve Your Life
950,000 Subscribers
...and Growing

 

 Self Improvement
 Natural Health
 Brain Improvement & IQ
 Home Business
 Daily Motivational Quote
 Selling and Sales Skills
 Loving Today -

 Relationships & Love

 Self Help Books


 

Free Self Improvement Goodies

FREE eBook of Michael Webb's "101 Romantic Ideas"
FREE Video/Audio - The Journey by Brandon Bays
FREE eBook "22 Success Lessons From Baseball"
7 Day Empowering Seeds eCourse by Coach Zev
"Secret Garden" guided meditation from Meditainment
FREE "Be Unstoppable" Starter Kit by Guy Finley
 

 


 

 

 
 

You May Not Be A Successful Interviewer If ...
By Stan B. Walters "The Lie Guy®"

 

 

Email this article    Printer friendly page                                                   Submit Your Articles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 
You are unacquainted with the case details.
Efforts at "winging it" in the interview room or going on a "fishing
expedition" very rarely produces positive results. You should
always approach every interview with the "construction of proof"
as your objective. That's for all interviews - victims, witnesses,
suspects, applicants, informants, petitioners, etc.

You approach your subject with an assumption of guilt.
No one can be truly objective when they enter the interview room
but by assuming guilt, we typically ignore asking the questions or
hearing answers that might challenge and even threaten our pre-
conceptions.

You use an “accusatory style” interview.
An accusatory style tends to "drive" the interview in only one
direction and rarely uncovers new or additional information. It also
seldom generates cooperation from victims or witnesses and
compliance from subjects. An accusatory approach is also
notorious for generating contaminated statements.

You frequently interrupt your subject.
Any interview as well as an interrogation is far from being
successful without active, participatory listening by the interviewer.
Frequent interruption cuts off the flow of conversation and
ultimately information.

You are repetitive in your questioning or labor over the same line
of questioning.
Persistent questioning from a single narrow perspective tends to
frustrate even the cooperative subject - it tends to lock their
reasoning and thinking process into one line of thought. Varying
your approach, method of framing a question, and using a more
narrative-based approach results in content rich statements and
cooperative subjects.
Note: Once the interview starts out bad, it rarely ever improves.


© 2005 by Stan B. Walters "The Lie Guy®"



Author's Bio

Stan B. Walters runs the company Truth & Deception, Inc.
He works with agencies and organizations that want to train their
people how to conduct successful interviews and interrogations
and uncover the real story.
Stan@TheLieGuy.com
www.TheLieGuy.com
www.TheLieGuyBlog.com

 

 

 

Top of Page

 

Home | Articles | Free Newsletters | Discussion Board | Event Calendar | Self Help Experts | Self Improvement Store
Membership | Inspirational Quotes | IQ & EQ Tests | Complete Directory | Positive News | Media | Videos
Submit Articles | Submit Site | Terms Of Use & Disclaimer | Contact | Advertise | About Us

© 1996-2007 SelfGrowth.com. All rights reserved.