Professor Marie McIntyre of Georgia’s Institute of Government has researched the relationship between managers and personality. Her findings confirmed my own experiences as a psychologist and a consultant, and probably will confirm yours as well. Managerial types are more analytical then ...Professor Marie McIntyre of Georgia’s Institute of Government has researched the relationship between managers and personality. Her findings confirmed my own experiences as a psychologist and a consultant, and probably will confirm yours as well. Managerial types are more analytical then interpersonal, i.e., they are data driven.
They also exhibit a higher need for control than others. The higher up the hierarchy we look, the more prominent these personality traits become. We also know from the literature that successful managers must be able to network well and build solid interpersonal relationships across organizational disciplines. So here we have the paradox of a successful management team?controlling personalities coexisting with the need for positive collaboration, and keen analytical skills coexisting with the need for strong interpersonal skills.
These four domains must be balanced to insure progress. You may recall the dilemma Hal faced in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hal, overly controlling and overly analytic, diligently strived to achieve his company’s objectives. Ok, he was a computer, so we can cut him some slack. But he was also a crew member. Due to his lack of people skills, he failed to accurately assess how his decisions would affect the team. This imbalance led to disastrous results. We shouldn’t be too picky, but I think we can all agree that when one team member gives his colleague a lobotomy, it’s a clear indicator of a dysfunctional team.
Many managers and business leaders seem to have effectively integrated their controlling tendencies with collaborative skills and their analytic tendencies with interpersonal considerations. Considering that they may not be hard-wired that way, how have they achieved this? Well, necessity is the mother of invention. Or, as psychologists like to say, the approach/avoidance ratio has advanced from avoidance toward approach. That is to say that after taking a good, hard look at what must be accomplished, the successful manager realizes that it's more efficacious to give up some control and play with the team for the benefit of the organizational goals, not to mention his/her own career goals.
Professor McIntyre states that “interpersonal relationships are the cornerstone of teamwork.” What happens when you have several overly analytical group members of the team (not an uncommon scenario for management teams)? The research tell us that teams will falter and fail due to poor interpersonal skills. In fact, there is a direct statistical correlation here. The more analytical the team is, as a whole, the greater the probability of failure. This is statistics at its simplest; high analytic quotient equals low success.
Lets look at the control issue. Being in control is a very positive experience indeed. Nobody likes to be out of control, unless you’re a game show contestant. But being controlling is another thing entirely. And, over-controlling a work group or a project team is clearly on the scary side of the success gauge.
“Dr. Mac, pray tell, what happens with teams that have a number of controlling personalities ?”
“Teams that have several controlling members spend a lot of time arguing (Duh! Like how many times have we all experienced this?) and when a plan is formalized, it doesn’t get done.” Ok, been there, done that.
So there it is. Want to find out if you are more analytical then interpersonal? Answer these two questions.
1. I would rather work with things than people.
2. I would rather work with data than ideas.
If you have answered yes to both of these questions, you probably are more analytical then interpersonal. Here’s an exercise you can try to develop more interpersonal skills. In your next meeting, try to identify the interpersonal folks and listen more conscientiously to them. You might be underestimating the importance of their input, to the detriment of your organizational goals and career.
If you’re a control freak executive, here is another exercise. In your next meeting, try not to give any opinions (or speak at all, for that matter) unless directly asked to do so by the team. If the team comes up with an idea, try to let them run with it. If you’re a controlling type, you’ll find this exercise difficult. But you will learn a great deal about yourself quickly. This is an exercise you can try at home too. And I bet you’ll surprise yourself by how others begin to react to and interact with you.
Ian Glickman, Ph.D.
Learn more about leadership, occupational stress, conflict management, change management, team development and motivational speaking at Ian Glickman Consulting. Visit our web site at ianglickman.com
Dr. Glickman is a psychologist licensed in Pennsylvania and Iowa. For ten years he was a professor at Immaculate University teaching courses in leadership, team development, occupational stress, conflict resolution, business communication, and human development. He was on the teaching faculty of the leading national healthcare Devereux Foundation’s Institute of Clinical Training and Research. Dr. Glickman studied extensively in Europe and Asia and earned his bachelors degree in Creative Intelligence from Maharishi European Research University, Selisberg Switzerland. His master’s degree is in Counseling and Human Development from the University of Iowa and his Ph.D. in psychology is from Lehigh University. Dr. Glickman has participated in numerous conflict resolution projects nationally and internationally. Due to his work at the Devereaux foundation, he is the former chairman of the Pennsylvania committee for stress-free schools. He is a Fellow at the American Institute of Stress and a Diplomate of the American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress with an additional certificate in war trauma. Dr. Glickman has had numerous TV and radio appearances. He’s lectured at Princeton and Harvard universities and has published in Princeton’s Innovations: The Journal of Science and Technology. Dr. Glickman has done innovative research on occupational stress and body types. He is a certified facilitator of the Steven Covey Speed of Trust Program. Dr. Glickman is a sought-after coach and speaker with years of consulting experience.