Urban Legends-Compliance Pitfalls
Written by Mordy Neuman
Did you ever notice how the operations folks cringe whenever the “E” word is mentioned? Just the mere utterance of ERGONOMICS is enough to send even the most forceful of managers running for cover. Do those operations folks not care about the people who work for them? I am certain the vast majority of them do. They just equate ergonomics with costly changes to the facility that often yields little in the way of benefits.
Why this negative perception? I don’t claim to have all the answers, nor do I claim to have a definitive answer. I do, however, have a definite theory. The negative perception of ergonomics held by many on the operations side is our fault. That’s right; we safety professionals have sabotaged the reputation of ergonomics. First, we have done little to combat the perception that work performed for compensation is the one and only cause of ergonomic injuries.
Those rounds of golf, tennis games, and hobbies had absolutely nothing to do with it. Second, we have fostered an inappropriate approach to the application of ergonomics. In the typical approach we go and look at existing work stations analyze the movements and apply the principles of the mystical science of ergonomics to recommend costly renovations to an improperly designed facility, product, or work practice. Ergonomics approached as a standalone science is at best grossly inefficient.
Based on this theory, what I recommend is as follows. Employers should adopt a broader approach to safety and provide their employees with information they can apply to their off the job activities. Educating a workforce about how activities such as golf and hobbies can affect their bodies would help to reduce ergonomic injuries and increase workplace productivity. More importantly though we owe it to those relying upon us for their safety to apply ergonomics in the work place more efficiently. This can best be achieved if we stop treating ergonomics as a standalone science. To get the maximum benefit from an ergonomics program we need to be proactive active by treating ergonomics principles as a set of design parameters to be applied up front whenever we design or specify tools, machines, equipment, work processes, and productsn
Article author
About the Author
Further reading
Further Reading
Article
Fear of Being Healthy?
Why do some people have trouble addressing health concerns?
October 8, 2026
Article
Why General Practice Accreditation Delivers Real Value Beyond Compliance
General practice accreditation is more than a compliance requirement. This article explains how accreditation supports patient safety, quality improvement, practice governance, funding eligibility, and ongoing trust in Australia’s healthcare system.
October 8, 2026
Website
HealthNexo
HealthNexo provides trustworthy, evidence-based health information and the latest health news. We cover disease prevention, diagnosis, nutrition, fitness, and wellness to help you make informed decisions for a healthier life.
October 2, 2026
Article
Dengue Diagnosis: Which Blood Tests Are Used and When?
Dengue diagnosis blood tests include RT-PCR/NAAT, NS1, IgM, IgG, and CBC. Early tests detect the virus, while IgM becomes more useful later. CBC helps monitor the patient but cannot confirm dengue alone.
October 2, 2026