There is probably few other synthetic glucose substitute as controversial as aspartame. The FDA authorized it in 1974 and it has been hounded by strong criticism ever since. The original research, according to critics, was not enough and not accurate. Another issue that critics toss is that there was a likely conflict of interest in its authorization. In 1987 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) verified that the authorization process of aspartame really followed the proper procedure.

There are actually claims that aspartame side effects are many and the list includes fatality. If those assertions rely on facts, then there's no doubt that this artificial table sugar substitute must be prohibited. We have to take a good look at this hotly debated artificial sweetener. Both parties are shouting foul. It's an elaborate hoax that brought on the negative coverage according to the proponents. It really is poison, critics claim.

There's the issue of research that we will examine to begin with. There's an abundance of research on this synthetic sweetener. Right now, there are 166 reported studies. The producer of this artificial table sugar substitute in fact financed around half of all those studies. Not one of the manufacturer-funded scientific tests discovered any health problems. Health issues are documented by 92% of the independent studies, on the other hand.

Interestingly, there are plenty nations worldwide that accept using this artificial sweetener. The use of this artificial table sugar substitute in foods and drinks happens to be approved by the FDA in the United States. The European Scientific Committee on Food also okayed the use of this glucose alternative. It says that assuming that the suggested amount of ingestion is observed there shouldn't be any adverse side effects.

Despite government acceptance, the complaints continue to persist. The side effects of aspartame are recorded by a 1000-page book authored by Dr. H.J. Roberts. He states that roughly 80% of all food additive problems reported to FDA are linked to this controversial sugar substitute.

The sugars replacement is said to aid in weight reduction although not everybody agrees. It's 100 times sweeter than table sugar and thus only little quantities are required therefore smaller calorie intake. The critics point out that it can actually bring about weight gain as it induces hunger.

Whenever there's smoke, there's also fire so the old saying goes. It's not really worth jeopardizing your health on an man-made table sugar substitute that you are unsure about. And you've got alternatives too in the case of low calorie sweeteners. Take stevia for example. When considering wholesome foods, there are many that you can try. You will find quite interesting coconut oil benefits that you might want to check out.

There’s simply just too many websites declaring to be telling you correct information. You may really just have to depend on your own sound judgment eventually. Make sure that you don’t readily believe the things you read on the internet. Health assertions made should always be backed-up by provable and published scientific exploration. If an article can’t direct you to published scientific studies, then you don’t really have to believe what it’s telling. Wellbeing is a serious matter and should always be taken seriously.

Author's Bio: 

More aspartame side effects facts on the given link. The supplied link contains extra facts concerning benefits of coconut oil.