Different ERP Implementation Methodologies
Written by Dr Easton Patrick
Enterprise Resource Planning involves applications which collectively function to assist in all the cardinal areas of management process. Choosing the right way of implementing ERP is as important as choosing the right software. ERP implementation methodologies should be discussed with the vendor so as to use the best suited method. Some of the various ways of implementation are the Phased rollout, the Big bang method and the Parallel adoption. To choose the appropriate method of ERP implementation may be difficult as what may work for some company may not work for the other. The strategy has to be chosen according to the circumstances. Let us look at the different ERP implementation methodologies in details as below:
1. Big Bang: In this, the implementation of the Enterprise Resource Planning system happens at once and the system is installed across the company at once. To achieve this, a lot of planning has to be done prior to the implementation. With proper planning in place, the new ERP system is launched by switching off the old system. This kind of ERP implementation methodologies cost a little less and is quick. It happens all at once, so the implementation time is shorter and all are aware of the day the implementation is going to take place. The training period is also shortened as the training is given only for using the new system and not for the transition period. But Big bang has its set of disadvantages too. The employees have lesser time to get used to the new system and some details can be overlooked in order to switch over to the new system in one go. The full testing of the system before implementation may be difficult to carry out and a failure in any part can affect the others parts.
2. Phased Rollout: This is different from the Big bang and the changes do not all happen at once. The implementation is done in a series of phases which are predetermined module wise, unit wise or by location. In the phase rollout by module, the modules are implemented one by one. The critical ones are implemented first and then the rest added. In some cases, the critical ones are added later. One of the ERP implementation methodologies is phased rollout unit wise in which the implementation is done in one business unit at a time. In the phased rollout location wise, if the company has multiple locations, the new system is implemented one location at a time. This approach is used for large organizations usually. The advantages of phased rollout are that plenty of time is available for the alterations and users have more time to adapt to the changes. The disadvantages are that several adjustments are required and duration of implementation is very long.
3. Parallel Adoption: This is one of the least risky ERP implementation methodologies as it includes running of the old and the new ERP system together. It has its own set of pros and cons.
There is certain way of choosing the right ERP methodologies for your company as it has to be based on the company strategies and goals.
Article author
About the Author
Further reading
Further Reading
Article
What to Consider When Adopting Multi-Tenancy in Kubernetes?
Organizations are starting to scale their cloud native operations. And as they do, the inefficiency of managing dozens of isolated clusters has become an evident problem. As the clusters continue to sprawl, businesses must unite diverse workloads onto shared infrastructure. This is because companies need better resource utilization and centralized governance among other things. But it is imperative to remember that going from a single tenant to a multi-tenant environment need
March 12, 2026
Article
Product Engineering Services: Driving Faster Development for Startups
It has been for everyone to see the short product lifecycles and a pressing need for rapid technical scalability that have come to define the modern startup ecosystem. For early-stage companies, the challenge is no longer just conceptualizing a solution. But they must also carry it out with enough precision to withstand high market volatility and fierce competition. We know that internal teams concentrate on core business strategy and fundraising. That still leaves us with th
March 12, 2026
Article
Why Modern Facilities Rely on Environmental Monitoring and Remote Temperature Probes for Compliance and Control
In today’s regulated and data-driven environments, organizations are under constant pressure to ensure that temperature and environmental conditions remain within defined limits. Even small fluctuations can result in product loss, compliance violations, or operational downtime. As a result, many facilities are moving away from manual checks and standalone sensors and adopting comprehensive environmental monitoring solutions instead. An environmental monitor provides rea
March 5, 2026
Article
Role of Data Warehousing in Ensuring Data Quality and Consistency
Organizations have come to rely heavily on large amounts of data in today's competitive markets. But to what end? For starters, to inform strategic decisions and power machine learning models. It goes without saying that the value of these digital assets is completely dependent on the accuracy of the underlying data. So, when data is fragmented or inconsistent across departments, you will obviously have inaccurate reporting and operational inefficiencies at your hands. This c
March 2, 2026