Avoid Stereotyping Pregnant Employees and Main Caregivers

In today's busy society, many find themselves struggling to handle perform, household, and other obligations. Not only do employees want to start their loved ones and still be employed, but many are finding themselves the main health medical service providers for their partners, kids, parents other elderly household members, or close household members with problems. While females, particularly females of color, are primarily responsible for these projects, men have begun assuming these caretaking responsibilities as well.

So what does it mean for these employees and their employers?

Unfortunately, those life choices and obligations have also led to generalizations being linked to this "class" of employees, which, in turn, have led to statements of elegance and revenge. Although there exists no particular laws barring elegance against health medical service providers per se, statements of sex elegance, impairment elegance, and revenge are providing employees with protection.

I'm not stereotyping!

Some business employers believe that because a woman is pregnant or has a child that she could not, would not, or should not execute particular work-related projects. Some business employers experience they are protecting an expectant employee or new mother by doubting her promotions to roles that may require relocations or travel or by removing job obligations they experience may be too intense or difficult. Other business employers believe pregnant employees, or those with daycare obligations, are less reliable and focused than their childless alternatives.

These sex generalizations result in a catch-22 for operating moms, because they are at the same time viewed by their business employers as "bad mothers" for investing some time to resources into their professions and "bad workers" for investing attention and time to their loved ones. Actually, some business employers believe that daycare obligations make women employees less reliable than men employees, even if the women worker is not pregnant and has not suggested that she will conceive.

Men are also not immune to generalizations. The view of men as "bread winners" has led to the perception that a man who works part-time is not a good father, even if he does so to proper take good care of his kids. Employers have also declined operating fathers and other men health medical service providers opportunities that have been provided to operating females, or they subject men who are primary health medical service providers to following or other different treatment.

As for workers who proper take good care of incapable household members, business employers believe that these workers are or will be unable to execute job responsibilities satisfactorily at the same as caring for a incapable individual. Actually, some business employers have rejected to hire such individuals because they believe the candidate will have to use frequent leave some time to arrive late due to their responsibility to proper take good care of their relative.

This type of stereotyping can lead to liability against an employer for sex or impairment elegance. Moreover, taking adverse action against employees that grumble about being treated differently or detrimentally because of their status will also support a revenge claim.