Ever wondered what are the best defects in the software development lifecycle? The ones that never appear. The notion prevention is better than cure works best in this regard. But development teams, key stakeholders, and quality assurance managers are still working on how to manage defects and improve product quality. The problem is that defect management is just considered a part of the software development process when they only fail to realize that it is a complete system that can have a great impact on the products rolling out into the market.

Filling Gaps with Defect Management
Defect management software defines a complete system where several defects appearing in the system are recorded, assigned, reviewed, and rectified. Defect management is vast and allows enterprises to ensure quality product releases while keeping the current need for demand in view. There are different software testing companies deploying defect management and tracking tools used to fill the gap between defects and quality metrics, making software development simpler and easier.

Effects of Poorly Handled Defect Management
Organizations focusing on software testing also need to emphasize defect management because these two go hand in hand. It is impossible to achieve maximum results from either of the two, without implementing both activities in software development. Poorly handled defect management can result in disasters for companies, loss of revenue, customers, and any other possible side effects to a business. Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is a very good example of failed defect management. Development teams failed to focus on key areas. Whether it was a defect in the supply chain or internal testing issues, poor defect management was the main reason behind its failure in the market. Thus, businesses cannot grow without investing proper time and money into the defect tracking system and its tools.

Streamlined Process for Effective Defect Management
Defect Visibility:
It is difficult to resolve defects if they are not visible. Moreover, teams are unaware of the decisions being made regarding various defects, thus it has an impact on the final product. A standard and access system is important to provide access to all the team members.

Prioritizing Defects:
To get the right results, testers prioritize defects according to their urgency levels. Hence, acquiring defect information is critical in prioritizing defects effectively. Quite often, small defects can have a huge impact on an app’s performance, so they need to be rectified immediately.

Defect Resolution:
The process and system should work efficiently, for which teams collaborate to resolve defects. This is only possible when the steps to resolve these issues are defined.

Analyzing Defects:
As we know development teams put great efforts into all stages of the defect management process, they also need to have a fair analysis for success in the product development process.

Conclusion
Defect management software is used to detect, record, prioritize and address various defects appearing in an application. It is important for enterprises to invest in the right defect management tools to get desired results and ensure earning profits.

Author's Bio: 

As a Senior Marketing Consultant at Kualitatem, Ray Parker loves to write tech-related news, articles, specifically quality assurance and information security. Apart from his techie appearance, he enjoys soccer, reading mysteries, and spending long hours working over at the New York office.