Find Best Tips On Writing A Thesis Statement About Rogerian Argument

Essential Tips for Writing a Thesis Statement with the Method of Rogerian Argument
Where in an Essay is the Rogerian Statement Written?

The thesis statement for a Rogerian argument does not come in the beginning like a typical essay. Instead in the introduction the writer writes about something that he and his audience share regarding the topic.

Then in the following paragraphs or the body the writer explains and advocates the audience’s point of view and states how their argument is valid. After doing so in a few paragraphs he states what his position on the issue is within the same circumstances and mentions how it differs from that of audience’s.
Language and Conveyance

The language should be neutral and clear. The reader should not feel deceived so the good will should prevail. Here is where the thesis statement comes in. But the statement should not be completely different. It should be an original thought but should also have some connection with the reader’s point of view.

The reader should feel that this is yet another aspect of a popular belief but is slightly different. Then the writer should explain how the consequences can vary if his position is adopted also keeping in mind what the reader believes in. It should reveal itself like something that was there but just not visible.
Conclusion of a Rogerian Argument

A Rogerian argument is concluded by offering possible solutions and ways leading to compromises that could keep both points of views in balance. The reader is not asked to give up his argument rather he is intrigued to think about writer’s position positively and take the conclusion offered as an assistance to face the challenge in various scenarios.

Rogerian arguments are beneficial in solving emotionally charged issues. The writer can only succeed if he understands readers’ position and presents their analysis honestly and clearly.

We often find speakers and authors getting involved or facing a kind of aggression and challenge defending their point of view amongst people who disagree with them. When some one is offended and his intellect or beliefs are challenged, his ego gets bruised and he only tries to prove himself right without considering the facts or arguments presented by the opponent. In that case no one actually pays attention to the gravity of the issue rather the focus of debate is dislocated.

Rogerian arguments come as a rescue to avoid such situations. The Rogerian argument is based on the fact that the findings of the opponent (or readers) are equally reputable and so the writer acknowledges them and finds a common ground, between him and his readers, related to the issue.

This encourages the reader to read on in an essay. Then the writer develops his argument taking the reader along and this helps in finding a better solution to the problem instead of originating bad taste and distrust. This style of arguing is based on Carl Roger’s work on psychology.